Ni-Fi MBTI性格类型
性格
"Ni-Fi是什么人格？ Ni-Fi是MBTI中的INTJ人格类型，九型中的4w5 - sx/sp - 451，五大类型中的RLUAI，Socionics中IEI类型。"
After studying this type for the past 2–3 years I decided to write down everything I’ve managed to figure out and learn during that time from various posts and my own analyses. 1. Ni‑Fi as INTJ IN(F) It is the Ni‑Fi‑Te‑Se stack, in which Fi dominates over Te (the IIEE version of the INTJ type). Such a person is guided more by values and their own emotions than by practicality and facts. Outwardly they may appear cold and closed‑off, because they spend little energy on current events and group emotions, focusing instead on feelings connected to what has already passed or what may come, processing it all through personal values and emotions. Ni here functions as abstract meaning, often mistaken for Te‑style planning, but in reality not based on schedules. Combined with Fi, this produces an individual who filters events through personal values and feelings, seeking deeper meaning in them, which can make them seem like solitary artists or philosophers. Ni-Fi users may still have visible Te because it is still one of their main extraverted functions, but they still value Fi more. Examples of characters that perfectly match how I see Ni‑Fi: Raiden Ei (not Shogun) https://www.personality-database.com/profile/389439/raiden-ei-genshin-impact-mbti-personality-type Phrolova https://www.personality-database.com/profile/1696635/phrolova-wuthering-waves-mbti-personality-type 2. Shadow and why not INFJ? Ni‑Fi as INFJ There is no such thing as an INFJ with Ni‑Fi. INFJs can only be Ni‑Fe or Ni‑Ti, and using the shadow system in such cases is incorrect because INFJs have Fi in the Critic position, which is not a normally functioning role like Fi in the main stack. Fi Critic is critical of one’s own use of Fi as well as others use of it. Simply put, people with the INFJ type will see Fi as something negative in themselves and in others, not as a main driving force or motivation. When working with shadow functions, you can’t treat them as normal functions but only by their position and role. Also, the shadow position doesn’t change with combinations, so a Ni‑Fi‑Te‑Se user has shadow functions in the form of Ne‑Ti‑Fe‑Si, which puts Fe in the blindspot position, meaning they show no signs of Fe presence. The same logic applies to any type (for example: an INTJ will not be Ni‑Ti, and an ISFJ will not be Si‑Fi). In summary: Ni‑Fi in pure form, despite weaker Te (but still stronger than in Fi doms), always has Te > Fe. If someone has Fe > Te, they are most likely an ISFP Fi‑Ni, because that type has stronger Fe and weaker Te and the functional difference between the two types isn’t that big. 3. Ni‑Fi as INFP It sounds strange, but in fact you can describe this stack as INFP only and exclusively as a letters type, like on the 16personalities website, which is based on letters. Functionally, in MBTI, Ni‑Fi is still an INTJ. I — Introverted N — iNtuitive F — Feeling P — Perceiving - because Ni, like Si, is an information‑perceiving function, not a judging function like Fi or Te. Even so, typing this configuration as INFP is very forced and incorrect, because typing INFP here would mean typing in MBTI terms, by functions, not by letters. Also, INFP in MBTI (Fi‑Ne‑Si‑Te) does not use Ni in its base stack. Only as a Critic function, which shows that in MBTI these are two entirely different types. 4. Correlations with other types Ni‑Fi is the only combination that fits with Enneagram 4w5, but it is closest to SX5, optionally SP5 (both with a 4 wing, because a 6 wing works better with types high in T, like INTJs with strong Te or INTPs). SO5 does not fit at all. As for tritype: 54X. Regarding socionics, ILI seems to fit better because of Ni dominance, though many people suggest IEI, which does not really resonate with me... IEI is still based on socionic Fe, which, even though it is not identical to MBTI Fe, still does not fit well with Ni‑Fi. LII does not fit this type because LII is based on types with strong T, like INTJ (Ni‑Te) and INTP. Big Five: RLXXI - this scheme is best suited for Ni-Fi (X means that what is there does not have a big impact, for example RLOAI and RLUEI can also fit the same). As for Attitudinal Psyche, I do not have a universal scheme to assign here, although it could be something like: L: 1–3 E: 1–3 F: 3–4 V: 3–4 Number means position (1L, 2E, 3F, 4V means LEFV) I'll try to refine this post with new data in the future to perfectly capture how this combination works. I might even try write about other combinations here.
