{{ชื่อ}} ประเภทบุคลิกภาพ MBTI
บุคลิกภาพ
"LVEF (Einstein) ประเภทบุคลิกภาพประเภทใด LVEF (Einstein) เป็นประเภทบุคลิกภาพ INTP ใน mbti, 5w6 - so/sp - 514 ใน Enneagram, RCOEI ใน Big 5, ILI ใน Socionics"
Archetypically ILI but fits ILE as the "classical scientist" mentioned (Einstein himself as typed by Aušra, and Leonardo da Vinci as both were ILE) 2V fits both ILI and LVEF as democratic types and individualists (noble will) with dogmatic thinking (more common with Ti than socionics Te). I mean they're literally an extinguishment pair. 3E and 4F is natural for both. Einstein's dislike for sentimentality fits Fe-PoLR, but it's not contradictory to Se-Fi Super-Ego (taking an attitude towards an observed obejct) and mobilizing Fe (the bad mood and temperament). 3E is a spectrum that fits inert ethics regardless of Fi-PoLR or Fe-PoLR. "The composure of Bush's 3rd Emotion also affected the results of the presidential elections for a second term. Not positively, of course. The Americans are tired of a president devoid of charm, with a forced smile, making smart but extremely boring speeches. Although we now understand that Bush, due to the 3rd Emotion, only looked insensitive, and was not so. But... Bush tried to explain this to the public, saying: "Of course, the president has to switch from domestic policy issues to foreign policy issues, and then back to domestic issues, all the time. Sometimes, like today with this Thai singer singing as a disabled boy from Bangkok, I am captured by the emotion of the moment, and the emotions come out. When I looked at the happy face of this blind boy, abandoned by his parents on the streets of Bangkok, who was now singing on the south lawn, I must admit that I had a spasm." this is how Super-ID Fe works and Bush himself was neither ILE nor an ILI, but an LSI. The point is how 3E is a spectrum that can fit in different ways though information metabolism. "I will say more, we can name three “Einsteins” who not only devoted their lives to art, but became the greatest painters in world history. The reader will be surprised, but these are: Andrei Rublev, Leonardo da Vinci and Georges Seurat. Almost nothing is known about Rublev, very little about Leonardo, and little more about Seurat than about Leonardo. But if we sort the biographical crumbs according to the scheme known to us, and most importantly, put them side by side, works that are incomparable in time and space, then the typical “Einsteinian” picture of the mental organization of all three will build itself. 1st Logic. The works of all three are distinguished by an intellectual fullness that surpasses any custom. Analysis of the compositions of Rublev, Leonardo, Seurat shows the mathematical precision of every point, detail, line, i.e. demonstrates the extreme strength of the artist’s head, visible already from the way he builds the composition. The fact that Leonardo was a great scientist and engineer, and envious people criticized Seurat as a “chemist” and “mathematician” only confirms the conclusions following from the analysis of their special compositional gift. Seurat marked with a cross one characteristic statement in an article from the magazine "Ar": "In art, everything must be conscious," and there is no doubt that both Rublev and Leonardo would have signed it. 2nd Will. All three apprenticed for a short time, quickly surpassed their teachers and soon found their own path in art. Although Rublev and Leonardo had envious teachers - Theophanes the Greek and Perugino. All three were the greatest reformers of painting of their time, but they did not create their own schools and it does not seem that they strived for this. The works of Rublev, Leonardo, and Seurat are characterized by the static character and inner peace of the characters and nature; they seem to be washed by the silence and peaceful loneliness of a self-sufficient person. And all these are clear signs of a “noble” psychology, strong, independent, creative, calm, self-confident. 3rd Emotion. The painting of Rublev, Leonardo, Seurat is not a painting of feelings, but a painting of moods, i.e. matters much more subtle than those that painting usually represents. The gesticulation and facial expressions of the characters are characterized by extreme restraint; no seething is observed in the views of nature captured on the canvases of these artists. Although only the smile of “La Gioconda” was dubbed “mysterious,” in fact, the entire work of Rublev, Leonardo and Seurat is mysterious in its inexpressibility, the unformulability of those states that, existing at the level of ultrasound, are only guessed in their works. Any attempts to describe the moods of “La Gioconda”, “Zvenigorod Spas”, “Courbevoie Bridge” are doomed, because words that adequately convey their tenderness, subtlety and complexity simply do not exist in nature. 4th Physics. At the same time, if, greatly simplifying and coarsening, we try to formulate a typical mood for the creativity of all three, and name their emotional dominant, then it will be sadness. As already mentioned, “lazy people” are a people who are vitally weakened and give preference to dark-colored emotions."
ชีวประวัติ
In general, Einstein is a rather sociable, albeit shy psychosophy type. Cautious in expressions, but if he said something, it means "it is." Tends to democratically manage a small team and avoid disputes as much as possible. LVEF Descriptions: https://psychosophy.ru/books/sintaksislubvi/sintaksislubvi124.html https://bestsocionics.com/psychosophy/lvef/ Functions: First Logic https://psychosophy.ru/books/sintaksislubvi/sintaksislubvi27.html Second Will https://psychosophy.ru/books/sintaksislubvi/sintaksislubvi71.html Third Emotion https://psychosophy.ru/books/sintaksislubvi/sintaksislubvi20.html Fourth Physics https://psychosophy.ru/books/sintaksislubvi/sintaksislubvi55.html
