Orang & karakter
Video game
Honkai Impact 3rd
Void Archives tipe kepribadian MBTI

Void Archives tipe kepribadian MBTI

Void Archives tipe kepribadian

Kepribadian
Biografi
Kepribadian correlate
Karakter serupa
Sifat dan karakteristik

Kepribadian

"Jenis kepribadian apa itu Void Archives? Void Archives adalah tipe kepribadian ENTP di mbti, 1w2 - sp/sx - 315 di enneagram, SCOEI dalam Big 5, dalam socionics."

Why not Si? See Inferior Si below. Dominant Ne Void Archives is open to novelty: he repairs a robot, reimagines the purpose of train cars, and works with knowledge from a lost civilization to create new things. These behaviors indicate he is not rigid or closed off to new concepts or uses for things. He demonstrates non-traditional thinking, such as repurposing a "Meeting Car" into a "Party Car" because the established use did not make sense to him. Creating and programming the robot Shush also shows inventive, unconventional problem-solving. Auxiliary Ti His decision to rename the Meeting Car was based on a logical critique of its stated purpose ("didn't make any sense for a meeting to take place in such a large car with so few Nameless"), showing he dissects the logic behind established conventions. He challenges received information when it does not fit his reasoning. The act of questioning the established use of the train car and generally being described as pretentious and unfriendly suggests a naturally skeptical attitude toward the norms and beliefs of those around him. He is not described as taking things at face value and instead challenges conventions. Tertiary Fe While he does interact with others (e.g., creating jokes with Shush), his speech and behavior are described as pretentious and unfriendly, and he leaves a negative impression on the crew. He is not careful or considerate but is still making choices in how he presents himself—just poorly, resulting in others disliking him. Inferior Si Void Archives is shown traveling through space with Welt, exploring unknown territory, and involving himself in unconventional actions like repairing robots and renaming cars, none of which demonstrate reliance on what is familiar or tried and true. His behavior reflects curiosity and experimentation over comfort with the known. There is no evidence in the narrative of him expressing or acting on personal tangible preferences or a need for personal comfort. His actions are more about utility or experimentation rather than comfort-driven behavior.