1. People & Characters
  2. Television
  3. Love Island USA

Huda (S7) MBTI Personality Type

Personality

What personality type is Huda (S7)? Huda (S7) is an ESFP personality type in MBTI, 2w3 - SX2 - 287 in Enneagram, SLUEN in Big 5, ESE in Socionics.

She’s the SX2 archetype : Positioning themselves as “I’m doing this for YOU!! :))” then rarely following through, displaying the 2s tendency to give in order to get but resent giving and eventually avoiding “giving” once the targeted person’s admiration is secured, also to avoid responsibility of their own actions. It’s a lot easier to get away with shifty behavior when insisting it’s for the sake of another person and that you’re “only trying to help YOU :) 🥹🫶🏼” a deflection tactic in order to maintain the 2s desperate need for love and a self inflated image of “good person with good intent” even when behaving solely with self interest, the SX2 can’t even acknowledge to THEMSELVES that that’s what they’re doing or else it’d destroy their carefully defended ego. hyper-sexualizing themselves for the sake of love and place worth on their ability to be loved and adored in an aggressive way, unlike SX8 who are still 8s and will avoid direct confrontation with their own feelings, especially their need for love. Huda’s intense focus on sexual behavior and how strong she came across was insane and her intense feelings of victimhood oppose the 8s avoidance of vulnerability and personal feelings. Very very very demanding about how much they feel the other person is giving them and lashes out when they feel like the other person isn’t giving them enough of what they demand, often feeling like “I’m carrying this relationship” when the reality is that they both not only drop the ball a lot, but they expect the other person to not only catch the ball every single time but also juggle it and three more balls too. Their demands are impossible to meet — they want to be spoiled and genuinely believe that because they’re so “good and giving and kind and generous” etc. that they deserve it. They measure love by exchange and how much the other does for them, as they position everything THEY do as if it’s for the other, even when it’s actually not and not even the SX2 themselves can admit it. A total lack of accountability — SX2s will always rather say that they “feel attacked” when being called out for things because they can’t stand for their internal psyche to be criticized and destroy their own inflated perception of themselves and their deservingness of love and sexual admiration. So they will fall back onto feelings of victimhood so as to avoid admitting faults aloud. Even when huda acknowledges things, she does so in a roundabout way that never acknowledges her repeated patterns of hypocritical, possessive, negative and manipulative behavior. This is the main way SX2s will manipulate. Uses “emotions” as a manipulative justification to explain behavior in a way that avoids confronting reality As an exaggerated example: “you can’t hate me for punching you in the face because obviously I was super sad when I was expecting you to have gotten me flowers and it turns out you didn’t get me flowers!! So, yeah, i was super upset and I reacted emotionally!! You’re the one who made me sad and to suggest that I’m a bad person for that is an attack upon my character. I do X, Y and Z for you which is obvious proof that I’m actually a really, really, super super good person and it’s unfair for you to call me a bad person when I punched you in the face because you’re the one who didn’t get me flowers and who made me sad in the first place, while knowing I wanted flowers!!” Is a classic SX2 mentality. I had the worlds most insufferable SX2 roommate a few years ago, and a good example of her emotion manipulation was the fact that this girl seemed to genuinely believe that every problem in her life, from her perspective, was the product of her just being “TOO good of a person” even when her actual ACTIONS said otherwise. She was always “TOO generous” “TOO forgiving” “TOO trusting” “TOO worried” “TOO kind” and acting like THOSE were the things that got her into conflict with others rather than her actual faults.

Biography

google-playapple-store